Magazine Posts

Shaking Hands | The Past That Shaped Us | Kudos365 History Series

A handshake is one of the most familiar gestures in human society. Two people extend their right hands, clasp them briefly, and release. The exchange may last only a few seconds, yet it can communicate welcome, trust, respect, agreement, or congratulations.

We shake hands when meeting strangers, greeting friends, concluding negotiations, celebrating achievements, and marking important occasions. The gesture crosses many cultural and national boundaries, although its meaning and popularity vary considerably around the world.

But why did clasping another person's hand become such a widely recognized expression of goodwill? The answer reaches back thousands of years, to societies in which the open hand could represent peaceful intentions and a physical greeting could carry considerable social meaning.

Ancient Origins: A Gesture of Peace

The precise origin of the handshake is unknown. No surviving historical record identifies the first people to exchange one, and similar gestures may have developed independently in different societies. One familiar explanation is that extending the right hand demonstrated that a person was not holding a weapon. In societies where personal encounters could involve danger, offering an empty hand may have served as a visible indication of peaceful intentions.

This explanation is plausible, but it should not be mistaken for a documented account of how handshaking began. Historians cannot establish that the gesture originated specifically as a weapons check, nor that shaking hands was intended to dislodge a concealed dagger. What we do know is that clasped hands appeared in ancient representations of human relationships. In the ancient Near East, a ninth-century BCE relief from the reign of the Assyrian king Shalmaneser III depicts the king clasping hands with a Babylonian ruler. The  scene suggests a gesture associated with political recognition or agreement.

Ancient Greek art also provides important evidence. From approximately the fifth century BCE onward, handclasping appears in sculptures and funerary monuments. The Greeks used the term dexiosis for the joining of right hand s, a gesture that could express greeting, farewell, affection, or an enduring relationship.

On some funerary monuments, the deceased and a surviving family member are shown clasping hands. These scenes demonstrate that the gesture could convey emotional and symbolic meanings beyond an ordinary greeting. The Romans likewise used images of joined right hands, associated with dextrarum iunctio, to represent concord, loyalty, and personal or political bonds. Such imagery appeared on coins, monuments, and other objects. By classical antiquity, the joined hand had become a recognizable symbol of connection between individuals.

From Personal Greeting to Public Agreement

For much of history, a handshake could signify more than a simple hello. In societies where formal contracts were less common or where personal reputation carried particular importance, physical gestures helped make promises visible. Joining hands could accompany an agreement, reconciliation, or pledge of loyalty.

The handshake did not itself guarantee that a promise would be honored. Its significance came from the social understanding that the participants were publicly acknowledging a relationship or commitment. This association between handshaking and agreement survived into later European traditions. Even today, people speak of sealing a deal with a handshake, particularly when they wish to emphasize mutual trust rather than elaborate formalities.

The gesture also became associated with equality, although that meaning was neither universal nor present in every historical use. Unlike bowing, kneeling, or other greetings that could emphasize differences in rank, a handshake places the participants in a relatively symmetrical physical position. Each person extends a hand, and both participate in the exchange. That characteristic eventually helped make handshaking attractive in communities seeking less hierarchical forms of social interaction.
 
The Quakers and the Growth of Everyday Handshaking

An important chapter in the development of modern handshaking occurred among the Religious Society of Friends, commonly known as the Quakers.
Emerging in seventeenth-century England, the Quakers rejected many conventional distinctions of social rank. Their religious principles emphasized spiritual equality, simplicity, and the belief that outward displays of deference should not determine a person's worth.

They were known for avoiding certain elaborate greetings and gestures associated with social hierarchy. Handshaking offered a relatively straightforward way to acknowledge another person without the formal distinctions expressed by bowing or removing one's hat. The Quakers support of handshaking helped top establish it as an ordinary, socially acceptable greeting among equals.

During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, handshaking became increasingly familiar in European and North American social and commercial life. Its use expanded alongside changing conventions of politeness, business relationships, and public interaction. By the modern era, a handshake had become an expected part of many professional introductions and formal encounters.

The Handshake in Business and Diplomacy

As commercial institutions developed, handshaking acquired a particularly strong association with business. It could mark the beginning of a relationship, acknowledge an agreement, or express confidence between parties. The phrase a handshake deal came to represent an understanding based on personal commitment, even when written contracts were absent. In diplomacy, the gesture developed a different but related role.

When political leaders shake hands before cameras, the exchange becomes a public symbol. It may suggest cooperation, reconciliation, mutual recognition, or the willingness to negotiate. The meaning can be especially powerful when the participants represent governments or groups with a history of conflict. A diplomatic handshake, however, does not necessarily mean that underlying disagreements have been resolved. It is a visible expression of contact or agreement whose political significance depends upon the circumstances. The gesture's simplicity makes it particularly useful in such settings. It can communicate a message instantly, without requiring a shared spoken language.

Different Cultures, Different Greetings

Although handshaking is familiar across much of the world, it has never been humanity's universal greeting.
In Japan, bowing has long played an important role in expressing respect and acknowledging social relationships. In Thailand, the wai, performed by placing the palms together, serves a similar purpose. In India, namaste, often accompanied by joined palms, is another established form of greeting.

In some societies, handshakes are customary but follow different conventions concerning duration, firmness, or the use of one or both hands. Religious and cultural practices may also influence whether people shake hands across genders.
These differences demonstrate that the underlying purpose of a greeting—recognizing another person's presence and establishing an appropriate relationship—can be expressed through many gestures. The handshake became internationally recognizable partly through the expansion of European commercial, diplomatic, and political conventions. Its global familiarity should not be confused with universal cultural preference.

What a Handshake Communicates

A handshake is unusual because it combines a symbolic gesture with direct physical contact. Extending a hand requires a small act of mutual cooperation. Both participants must recognize the invitation, respond, and coordinate their movements. The result is a brief physical acknowledgment of one another.

In modern social settings, people sometimes interpret the firmness, duration, or manner of a handshake as an indication of confidence, friendliness, or sincerity. Such impressions, however, are not reliable measures of character. They are influenced by cultural expectations, personal habits, physical abilities, and the circumstances of the encounter.

A firm handshake may be considered appropriate in one setting and unnecessarily forceful in another. A gentle handshake may reflect courtesy rather than uncertainty. What gives the gesture meaning is not its physical strength but the shared social understanding surrounding it.

A Tradition That Continues to Change

The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated how quickly even deeply established social customs can change.
Concerns about disease transmission led many people to replace handshakes with waves, nods, verbal greetings, or other gestures that avoided physical contact. In business and diplomatic settings, greetings that had once seemed almost automatic became matters of personal choice. As restrictions eased, handshaking returned in many places, but the experience also reinforced the idea that physical contact should not be assumed or required.

Today, the handshake remains a familiar part of social, professional, and ceremonial life. Yet it exists alongside a wider range of accepted greetings, reflecting changing expectations about health, personal boundaries, and cultural differences.

Lasting Impact

The handshake has endured because it transforms a simple physical action into a recognizable expression of human connection.
Across centuries, clasped hands have represented peaceful intentions, affection, agreement, loyalty, reconciliation, and mutual recognition. Although the circumstances have changed, these meanings remain familiar in modern business, diplomacy, and everyday encounters.
Its history also illustrates how social customs evolve. A gesture used in ancient political and personal relationships gradually became an ordinary greeting in many societies, acquiring new meanings as ideas about equality, politeness, and public behavior changed.


History Series © 2026–Present Kudos365. All Rights Reserved. | M2.0.0 | HSR2.4.0 

12th-century crypt of Verdun Cathedral, France, rediscovered after the Great War during the restoration works. When the reconstruction of the crypt was completed, the cathedral was reconsecrated on 10 November 1935.

Andreas F. Borchert, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. View source.

 Federico Bottos on Unsplash

NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day:

Does the blue nebula look like the head of a witch? The nebula is known popularly as the Witch Head Nebula because, it is said, the nebula's shape resembles a Halloween-style caricature of a witch's head. Exactly how, though, can be a topic of imaginative speculation. What is clear is that IC 2118 is about 50 light-years across and made of gas and dust that points to -- because it has been partly eroded by -- the nearby star Rigel. One of the brighter stars in the constellation Orion, Rigel lies just below the center of the featured image. The blue color of the Witch Head Nebula and is caused not only by Rigel's intense blue starlight but also because the dust grains scatter blue light more efficiently than red. The same physical process causes Earth's daytime sky to appear blue, although the scatterers in planet Earth's atmosphere are molecules of nitrogen and oxygen.

Photo by Piotr Czerski

A closer look at the mixture of minerals, water, air, and life that supports our landscapes and much of our food || Kudos365 - Exploring our World Series

After a heavy shower, one patch of ground absorbs the rain while another develops a puddle. A nearby bare slope sends muddy water toward the street. The same storm has reached all three places, yet the ground responds differently. What happens depends partly on something we usually notice only when it sticks to our shoes: soil.

A handful can look like an unremarkable brown material. Within it, however, mineral grains form a framework, spaces hold water and air, roots extend through channels, and microorganisms transform plant remains. The arrangement changes how rain moves, whether roots receive oxygen, and which nutrients plants can obtain.

Understanding soil begins with this distinction: it is a changing system with a physical structure, a chemical environment, and biological activity. Its ability to support plants depends on how those features work together. The fate of a raindrop offers a way to follow those connections.

How soil develops

Soil forms as climate and living organisms act on material at Earth’s surface over time. That starting material may be weathered bedrock, river sediment, windblown dust, volcanic ash, or deposits left by glaciers. The slope and position of the land influence drainage, erosion, and what accumulates there.

This history explains why soil is not the same everywhere, even within a small area. A wet hollow and a nearby hillside may develop different properties because water moves through them differently. Soil scientists examine both the material itself and its place in the landscape. They look below the surface because the visible top layer is only part of the story.

Key Terms at a Glance

Soil formation: Climate, life, landscape, and time transform the starting material.

Texture: The proportions of sand, silt, and clay.

Structure: How particles form clumps and spaces.

Pore space: Room for water, air, and roots.

Soil horizons: Layers that reveal how a soil has developed.

Organic matter: Material from living things and their remains.

Nutrient cycling: The reuse and transformation of essential elements.

Soil pH: A measure of acidity or alkalinity.

Infiltration: Water entering the ground.

Erosion: Soil being detached and carried away.

A handful of soil includes spaces

Much of what matters in soil is the space between solid particles. These pores hold changing amounts of air and water. In many mineral soils, pore space accounts for roughly half the volume, although the proportion varies with texture, structure, and compaction. Picture the spaces among objects loosely packed in a container.

The comparison helps explain why a material that feels solid underfoot can contain room for water and gases. Soil is more complicated than that container: its pores differ in size, connect unevenly, and change as roots grow and particles move. During rain, water enters available spaces and displaces some air. Afterward, some water drains away and air returns. If pores stay water-filled, oxygen supply can become restricted. Roots need oxygen for respiration, so a plant can struggle in wet ground even while surrounded by water. The balance between drainage and retention matters.

Particle size shapes the starting conditions

Rub a little moist soil between your fingers and differences become apparent. Sand feels gritty; silt feels smoother; clay can feel sticky and form a ribbon when moist. These names describe mineral particle-size groups, with sand the largest and clay the smallest of the three.

Their proportions determine soil texture. Sandy soils commonly drain readily but retain relatively little water. Clay-rich soils can hold substantial water, although some is held too tightly for roots to extract easily. A soil that stores more total water does not necessarily supply more usable water to a plant.

Texture provides an important starting point rather than a complete prediction. Clay mineral type, organic matter, layering, and the arrangement of particles also influence behavior. Loam names a particular mixture of particle sizes; it is not another word for compost, nor a guarantee that a soil will suit every plant.

The arrangement of particles changes water movement

Two soils with similar textures can respond differently to rain because their particles are assembled differently. Small clumps, called aggregates, create a network of spaces within and between them. This arrangement is soil structure.

Roots, fungal threads, and substances produced by microorganisms help bind particles together. Stable aggregates can resist breaking apart when wetted, helping preserve openings through which water enters. The larger connected pores also provide routes for air and growing roots.

Pressure from repeated traffic or machinery can compress soil, particularly under vulnerable moisture conditions. Compaction reduces important pore space and can restrict root growth and water movement. Returning to our rainstorm, a puddle may therefore reflect damage to structure rather than an inherently unsuitable texture. It can also indicate a high water table or a restrictive layer below. Surface appearance alone cannot identify the cause.

Soil layers reveal a longer history

A cut through the ground often shows layers with different colors and textures. These soil horizons develop as material is added, transformed, removed, or carried from one depth to another. Their sequence is called a soil profile.

A surface mineral horizon often contains more organic matter than the soil below. Farther down, a subsoil horizon may contain accumulated clay or other substances moved through the profile. Deeper still lies less-altered parent material, and in some places bedrock. Some soils also have a distinct organic layer at the surface.

These are common patterns rather than a universal stack of identical layers. Horizons can be absent, mixed by cultivation, buried, or strongly altered by construction. The profile helps explain why a dark, loose surface can overlie a layer that slows drainage or limits roots. A shallow handful cannot reveal every important condition beneath it.

Decomposition makes materials available again

A fallen leaf does not simply disappear into the ground. Bacteria and fungi break down its compounds, using some of the material for growth and releasing other components through their activity. Nutrients can return to forms that plants and other organisms can use.

This recycling links one generation of growth to the next. It is not instantaneous, and decomposition does not release every nutrient at the same rate. Temperature, moisture, oxygen, and the composition of the material influence what happens. Microorganisms can also temporarily take up nutrients into their own cells, making availability a moving balance.

Soil life therefore does more than occupy the spaces around roots. It helps transform the materials on which future growth depends. Yet biological activity alone does not guarantee ideal conditions. Soil communities include organisms with many different roles, including plant pathogens, and their effects depend on the surrounding environment.

Organic matter has several jobs

Plant residues, roots, microbial remains, and their decomposition products contribute to soil organic matter. In many mineral soils it represents a relatively small share of the total mass, but it influences several functions at once.

Organic matter supplies energy and nutrients to soil organisms, helps stabilize aggregates, and contributes to water and nutrient retention. A layer of plant residue on the surface also shields the ground from direct raindrop impact and helps reduce erosion. Material on top and material incorporated within soil can therefore help in different ways.

Adding compost may improve some conditions, but it does not instantly reproduce a mature soil profile or change clay particles into sand. Nor does more always mean better: amendments differ in nutrient content and other properties. Benefits depend on the soil, the material added, and the amount. Soil improvement requires understanding the problem rather than treating every patch of ground alike.

Nutrients must be chemically available

A soil can contain a nutrient that a plant still has difficulty obtaining. Roots generally absorb nutrients as dissolved ions, so the chemical forms present and their interactions with minerals and organic matter matter as much as the total quantity.

Soil pH describes acidity or alkalinity and influences these reactions. Under some conditions, nutrients become less accessible; under others, certain elements become available at harmful concentrations. Different plants also tolerate different conditions, so no single pH suits all vegetation.

This is why adding fertilizer without understanding the soil can fail to address poor growth. The limitation may involve pH, oxygen, restricted roots, or water rather than a shortage of the nutrient being added. A suitable soil test helps distinguish some of these possibilities. Chemistry, structure, and biology must work together; increasing one ingredient cannot reliably compensate for every other constraint.

Rainfall can be stored or carried away

When rain reaches the surface, its first challenge is entering the soil. Infiltration is that entry process. Water may then move deeper, remain in small pores, be absorbed by roots, or eventually return to the atmosphere through evaporation and plant water loss.

The familiar sponge comparison captures storage, but only partly. Soil is layered, its pores have different connections, and water is held with different strengths. Some retained water is accessible to roots; some is not. A site can also become saturated because incoming water exceeds the capacity of the profile to transmit it.

These distinctions explain why a brief, intense downpour can produce runoff even where gentler rain soaks in. The outcome depends on rainfall intensity, existing moisture, vegetation, slope, surface condition, and the ground below. Understanding infiltration helps connect a garden puddle to water movement across an entire watershed.

Erosion can remove what took time to develop

When water or wind detaches and transports soil, it changes both the place losing material and the place receiving it. Surface layers can lose organic matter and nutrients along with mineral particles. Muddy runoff can carry sediment and associated substances into streams.

Raindrops striking exposed ground can break weak aggregates apart. Flowing water can then transport particles, sometimes removing a thin layer that is easy to miss before conspicuous channels appear. Bare ground is therefore vulnerable even without a dramatic gully.

Vegetation and surface residues help protect the soil, while land management can either preserve or disrupt its structure. Soil continues to form, but that does not mean losses are quickly replaced. Development rates vary greatly, and restoring some functions is different from rebuilding an eroded profile. A productive surface can be damaged much faster than its full history can be recreated.

Soil stores carbon and also releases it

Plants take carbon from atmospheric carbon dioxide and incorporate it into organic compounds. Some enters soil through roots, residues, and other biological pathways. Decomposition returns part of it to the atmosphere, while another portion remains in the soil for varying lengths of time.

The amount stored reflects the balance between inputs and losses. Climate, mineral properties, moisture, and management all affect that balance. Protecting existing soil carbon and increasing storage where feasible can have benefits alongside improved soil function.

However, soil is not an unlimited or permanent container for carbon. Gains can slow, vary among sites, or be reversed by changes in management and environmental conditions. A treatment that improves one field cannot be assumed to have the same climate effect everywhere. Measuring change requires careful sampling and attention to depth and time, rather than relying on how dark the surface looks.

How the pieces fit together

Return to the three patches of ground after the storm. Their different responses now make more sense. Particle sizes establish some of the physical conditions, but aggregation and compaction alter the pathways water can follow. Layers below the surface can slow drainage. Roots and microorganisms affect structure and nutrient cycling, while the chemical environment influences what plants can absorb.

These relationships help explain why soil health is broader than fertility. Fertility concerns supplying plant nutrients; soil health also involves the capacity to maintain functions such as water movement, biological activity, and sustained growth. Fertilizer can address an identified nutrient deficiency while leaving a compaction problem unresolved.

The same connections matter beyond gardens and farms. Soil influences forest growth, the movement and quality of water, and how landscapes respond to storms. It can retain or transform some contaminants, but it cannot make every pollutant harmless. What enters the ground remains important.

What researchers are still learning

The main roles of pores, particles, organic matter, and nutrients are well established. Predicting exactly how a particular soil will respond to changing rainfall, warming, or a new management practice remains more difficult. Microbial communities are diverse, and their behavior depends on conditions that vary over short distances.

There is also no single measurement that captures every aspect of soil health. A laboratory nutrient test, an infiltration measurement, and an examination of the soil profile answer different questions. Researchers combine such evidence to understand change and evaluate management. The uncertainty concerns the details and magnitude of responses, rather than whether soil’s physical, chemical, and biological features are connected.

The Bigger Picture

Soil is where weathered minerals, living processes, air, and water interact. Its value lies in those relationships: spaces allow roots to breathe, structure guides rainfall, decomposition recycles materials, and chemistry helps determine what plants can obtain.

A handful of earth is therefore part of a landscape with a history and a continuing set of processes. Recognizing that makes a muddy stream, a struggling garden, or a field after rain easier to understand. Caring for soil begins with seeing the system beneath the surface.

This article is for general educational purposes. Scientific understanding may change as new research becomes available.

Exploring Our World | Kudos365 © 2026. All Rights Reserved. | M1.1.0 | HSR2.4.3

Panoramic view of the Kumaon Himalaya as seen from Ranikhet in the northern Indian state of Uttarakhand. Himalayan giants such as Trisul (7,120 m (23,360 ft)), Nanda Devi (7,817 m (25,646 ft)), Nanda Kot (6,861 m (22,510 ft)), Panchachuli (6,904 m (22,651 ft)) and other peaks are prominently visible.

Original: Harshit SR Derivative work: UnpetitproleX, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. View source.

Albert Camus ~ (November 7, 1913 – January 4, 1960) French philosopher, author, and journalist. Biography

Kendal on Unsplash

NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day:

The sky glows with soft pinkish colors of fading twilight in this serendipitous mountaintop vista. Taken in subfreezing temperatures, the thoughtfully composed photo shows snowy, rugged peaks seen from a mountain pass on 2017 November 14. Below lies the village of La Villa, Alta Badia in Italy's Dolomite Alps. Above the nestled village lights, the constellation Ursa Major hangs over the northern horizon. But most stunning is the intense fireball meteor. It was captured during the camera's exposure by chance as it flashed east to west across the northern horizon, under Ursa Major's familiar Big Dipper asterism. Sightings of this major fireball meteor were widely reported in European skies, making it one of the most reported fireball events ever for planet Earth's American Meteor Society and the International Meteor Organization. The meteor's measured track over Germany is consistent with its origin near the active radiant of November's Northern Taurid Meteor Shower, a shower associated with dust from Encke's comet.

Photo by Ollie Taylor